Per Curiam.
Respondent contends (1) that a Municipal Court judge is not required to retain his privilege to practice law during his entire term of office; (2) that an indefinite suspension from the practice of law is not a ground for removal of a judge under the Code providing for forfeiture of office for misconduct; and (3) that quo warranto is not the proper remedy.
The first contention involves the construction of Section 1901.06, Revised Code, which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
