BOMAR v. STATE


312 S.W.2d 174 (1958)

Lynn BOMAR, Warden, Respondent-Appellant, v. STATE of Tennessee, ex rel. Charles BOYD, Petitioner-Appellee. Lynn BOMAR, Warden, Respondent-Appellant, v. STATE of Tennessee ex rel. Chester Elmo WINSLOW, Petitioner-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

Rehearing Denied April 9, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry C. Foutch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent-appellant.

John J. Hooker, Jr., Hooker, Keeble, Dodson & Harris, Nashville, James F. Neal and Turney & Turney, Washington, D. C., for petitioners-appellees.


TOMLINSON, Justice.

The separate habeas corpus petitions of Boyd and of Winslow were consolidated for hearing because they present the same question, to wit, whether the statute under which each is being held in prison is unconstitutional, to wit, the Tennessee Habitual Criminal Statute, or whether the judgment, by reason of the punishment assessed under this statute, is void to that extent for want of jurisdiction to pronounce. This appeal is by the Warden of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases