PISTELL & CO. v. AETNA SEC.


13 Misc.2d 471 (1958)

C. K. Pistell & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Aetna Securities Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 17, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simon Klein for appellant.

Bernard S. Kanton for respondent.

HOFSTADTER and AURELIO, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; STEUER, J. P., dissents in opinion.


Per Curiam.

Though the order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment, on which no judgment was entered, is not appealable without permission (N. Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 154), its merits may nevertheless be considered by us because of the provision of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, allowing the court, on a motion made under that rule, to grant judgment to the adverse party even in the absence of a cross motion therefor. We have therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases