1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 5 Wis.2d
  5. 5 Wis.2d 465 (1958)
 

HEIMS v. HANKE

5 Wis.2d 465 (1958)

HEIMS and wife, Respondents, v. HANKE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 2, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Louis C. Ritter of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Rubin, Ruppa & Wegner of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Nathan Ruppa.

WINGERT, J.

Appellant contends that there was no evidence of actionable negligence on his part, that William's negligence, if any, could not properly be imputed to defendant, that no nuisance was established, that plaintiff's negligence was the sole cause of the accident, and that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence.

1. Defendant's negligence. The finding that the icy condition of the sidewalk was caused by the negligence of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases