1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 176 F.Supp.
  5. 176 F.Supp. 278 (1958)
 

SPAMPINATO v. BREGER & CO.

Civ. No. 15045.

176 F.Supp. 278 (1958)

Thomas O. SPAMPINATO, Plaintiff, v. M. BREGER & CO., Inc., Miles Breger, Dr. Guenther E. Winkler, Dr. Solomon Adelman, Dr. Max Weissman, Dr. Richard Perrault, City of New York, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

September 22, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas O. Spampinato, pro se.

Peter C. Brown, Corp. Counsel, New York City, for Adelman, Weissman and Perrault and City of New York.

Leiman & Trace, Maspeth, N. Y., for M. Breger & Co.

Martin, Clearwater & Bell, New York City, for Winkler.

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves this Court for leave to reargue a motion decided on August 28, 1958, or for leave to appeal from such determination.

The substance of the latter motion was an application by the defendants, M. Breger & Co., Inc., and Miles Breger, for a dismissal of the complaint as to them upon the ground that this Court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter. The motion for such dismissal was granted and the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases