MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. N.J. MFRS. CAS. INS. CO.


28 N.J. 17 (1958)

145 A.2d 15

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WILLIAM H. BAIR TRUCKING COMPANY, HORACE KELLY, SOUTH JERSEY PORT COMMISSION, OPERATING CAMDEN MARINE TERMINAL, DEFENDANTS, AND WILLIAM CHERRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 9, 1958.

Decided October 6, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine & Deighan, attorneys; Mr. Peter J. Devine, Jr., of counsel).

Mr. S.P. McCord argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent, Maryland Casualty Company (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys; Mr. S.P. McCord, Jr., of counsel).

Mr. Albert B. Melnik argued the cause for defendant-respondent, William Cherry (Messrs. Hermann, Melnik and Lowengrub, attorneys; Mr. Albert B. Melnik, of counsel).


The opinion was delivered PER CURIAM.

The trial court entered judgment in favor of defendant insurance carrier. 43 N.J.Super. 323 (Law Div. 1957). The Appellate Division reversed, 48 N.J.Super. 314 (App. Div. 1958), and we granted defendant's petition for certification. 26 N.J. 301 (1958).

The facts appear in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

The sole question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases