STATE v. FRATO

Nos. 35517 and 35518.

168 Ohio St. 281 (1958)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. FRATO, APPELLANT. (Two cases.)

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 19, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Saul S. Danaceau, for appellee.

Mr. Irwin P. Pohl, for appellant.


TAFT, J.

As the statement of the case indicates, the record of the Court of Appeals raises some doubt as to whether there was anything pending before that court after the dismissal of the appeal by the defendant, which apparently took place on June 26. Although it now urges that dismissal as a reason for denying defendant relief, the state made no such argument in its briefs in the Court of Appeals. It is not clear from the record whether that dismissal took place...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases