1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 3 Wis.2d
  5. 3 Wis.2d 429 (1958)
 

STATE v. BARTHULY

3 Wis.2d 429 (1958)

STATE, Respondent, vs. BARTHULY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 28, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Nathaniel D. Rothstein and Paul C. Konnor, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Eugene F. McEssey, district attorney of Fond du Lac county, attorneys, and John H. Bowers, assistant attorney general, of counsel.

STEINLE, J.

The primary issue on this appeal relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction of the defendant, Herbert W. Barthuly, with respect to each of the counts in the information charging him with having maliciously threatened to accuse John Staples of the crime of sodomy with intent to extort money. The defendant contends that the evidence does not establish (1) a threat to accuse of any particular crime or offense; (2) nor an intent ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases