1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 168 F.Supp.
  5. 168 F.Supp. 244 (1958)
 

NEW WRINKLE, INC. v. JOHN L. ARMITAGE & CO.

Civ. No. 25-56.

168 F.Supp. 244 (1958)

NEW WRINKLE, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN L. ARMITAGE & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

December 15, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCarter & English, Griffith H. Jones, Newark, N. J., Toulmin & Toulmin, Hugo Wikstrom and Herbert Brown, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Richards & Cifelli, Thomas Cifelli, Jr., Newark, N. J., for defendant.

MEANEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, asking for a declaratory judgment that the defendant's product "Armorhide" wrinkle finish composition is covered by plaintiff's patents, a decree of accounting and judgment for the amount ascertained thereby, for violation of the obligations of a certain license agreement between plaintiff and defendant allegedly covering defendant's wrinkle finish composition.

The issue can be determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases