1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 213 Or.
  5. 213 Or. 193 (1958)
 

UNLIMITED PROGRESS v. CITY OF PORTLAND

213 Or. 193 (1958)

324 P.2d 239

UNLIMITED PROGRESS ET AL v. CITY OF PORTLAND ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 10, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.J. Burrows, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Mark Hathaway and Ben G. Fleischman, Portland.

Alexander G. Brown, City Attorney, and Marian C. Rushing, Deputy City Attorney, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, C.J.

The plaintiffs commenced this suit in the circuit court of Multnomah county to enjoin the defendant, Will E. Gibson, and other city officials from placing on the ballot for submission to the voters at the election on May 16, 1958, an initiative measure(1) relating to the exposition-recreation center now in the process of development in the city of Portland.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases