1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 216 Md.
  5. 216 Md. 184 (1958)
 

MARTIN v. ARUNDEL CORP.

[No. 139, September Term, 1957.]

216 Md. 184 (1958)

140 A.2d 146

MARTIN ET UX. v. THE ARUNDEL CORPORATION ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for rehearing filed and denied, April 25, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Graham Boyce, Jr., with whom were Musgrave, Preston & Boyce on the brief, for the appellants.

J. Gilbert Prendergast, with whom were F. Duncan Cornell, Clark, Smith & Prendergast, and Tydings, Sauerwein, Benson & Boyd on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Charles Martin, Jr., and his wife, Jane C., (the Martins), sued the Arundel Corporation, (Arundel), in the Superior Court of Baltimore (Sodaro, J.) to recover damages for several annoyances and physical damage to their property allegedly arising out of the operation of a quarry in the neighborhood. Before trial, the Martins amended their cause of action to include a similar claim against Arundel-Brooks Corporation, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases