BALTIMORE TRANSIT CO. v. HARROLL

[No. 243, September Term, 1957.]

217 Md. 169 (1958)

141 A.2d 912

BALTIMORE TRANSIT COMPANY v. HARROLL

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 26, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Doyle, Jr., with whom were Theodore Sherbow and Sherbow & Sherbow on the brief, for the appellant.

Bernard W. Rubenstein for the appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We are called upon to determine the true relationship between an agreement by an employer to furnish medical care to injured or sick employees and certain provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The Baltimore Transit Company and the union representing its employees entered into a collective bargaining agreement. Article 17 of the agreement provided inter alia that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases