HETZEL v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD

Docket No. 22876.

161 Cal.App.2d 224 (1958)

326 P.2d 611

HERMAN E. HETZEL, Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 10, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riley & Hall and B.H. Neblett for Appellant.

John O. Paulston, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, James E. Sabine and Irving H. Perluss, Assistant Attorneys General, and Dan Kaufmann, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.


KINCAID, J. pro tem.*

Appellant (hereinafter called Hetzel) sues for a refund of $500 paid to the Franchise Tax Board (hereinafter called the Tax Board) on account of the principal of additional personal income taxes of $14,330.11 for the calendar year 1951.

The appeal is on the judgment roll from a judgment dismissing the complaint. The record consists of the complaint, answer, appellant's motion for judgment on the pleadings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases