SPAUGH v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

No. 392.

105 S.E.2d 280 (1958)

249 N.C. 133

Carl F. SPAUGH, Jr., and wife, Betty Jo Spaugh. v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 29, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deal, Hutchins & Minor, Winston-Salem, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Henry G. Barnhill, Jr., Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee.


PER CURIAM.

The assignments of error brought up on this appeal relate only to the exclusion of testimony of male plaintiff, and of his father pertaining to matters not relevant and material to the issues raised by the pleadings. In them prejudicial error is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment below there is

No error.

PARKER, J...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases