1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 4 Wis.2d
  5. 4 Wis.2d 380 (1958)
 

FELDSTEIN v. HARRINGTON

4 Wis.2d 380 (1958)

FELDSTEIN, Appellant, vs. HARRINGTON and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 3, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Reino A. Perala of Superior, and Friedman & Friedman of Duluth, Minnesota, and oral argument by Newton S. Friedman.

For the respondents there was a brief by Hughes, Anderson & Davis of Superior, and oral argument by John L. Davis.

CURRIE, J.

Inasmuch as we have reached the conclusion that a new trial is required because of erroneous rulings on admissibility of evidence, we find it unnecessary to discuss plaintiff's contentions with respect to the inadequacy of the damages awarded. Most of plaintiff's injuries were subjective in character and their establishment therefore largely depended upon plaintiff's credibility as a witness. Such testimony was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases