CAMMARATA v. CONLEY


13 Misc.2d 349 (1958)

Frank Cammarata et al., Doing Business as Pilgrim Real Estate, Appellants, v. Bertha Conley et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

June 17, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Guastella and Edward Marks for appellants.

Emerson A. Swartz for respondents.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The action against the defendant Swartz, as stakeholder, was properly joined with the action against defendant Conley (Civ. Prac. Act, § 258) and he was properly before the court as a conditionally necessary party (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193). This defendant, if so advised, may apply for appropriate relief under the provisions of section 285 of the Civil Practice Act.

The judgment should be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases