PER CURIAM.
Defendant moves for an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff $928.80 as damages for hail and windstorm damage to a tobacco crop covered by defendant's insurance policy. Defendant's ground of reversal is that the court improperly allowed the introduction of incompetent evidence. This evidence consisted of percentage estimates of the damage to the crop testified to by neighboring farmers who had seen the crop hung in the barn.
Defendant contends...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.