OSBORN v. GAMBLE ET AL


213 Or. 127 (1958)

322 P.2d 926

OSBORN v. GAMBLE ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 19, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy F. Hughes, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Hughes, Vershum & Hughes, Portland.

Harry A. Harris, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Clifford S. Beckett, Oregon City, and Abe I. Bernstein, Portland.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, BRAND and McALLISTER, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff and his wife Daisy, about 15 years prior to the commencement of this suit, became the owners of 20 acres of land in Clackamas county, Oregon. Plaintiff and his wife, although not divorced, later separated and by mutual agreement conveyed the 20 acres of land to a son Ronald and his wife. At plaintiff's request Ronald and his wife conveyed 10 acres of this property to plaintiff's daughter Ruth Gamble and her husband James...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases