1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 145 Conn.
  5. 145 Conn. 191 (1958)
 

BACHMAN v. FORTUNA

145 Conn. 191 (1958)

S. K. BACHMAN ET AL. v. JOHN FORTUNA ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 25, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip H. Smith, with whom was Bruce Dillingham, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

George Koenig, for the appellee (named defendant).

WYNNE, C. J., BALDWIN, DALY, KING and MURPHY, JS.

MURPHY, J.

This action was instituted by seven plaintiffs, as joint and several promisees, upon an alleged promise of the defendants to prepare and improve a street upon which the plaintiffs had purchased building lots. Five of the plaintiffs withdrew, and the two remaining plaintiffs, Bachman and Sweetser, proceeded to trial upon an amended complaint. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of these plaintiffs, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, to recover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases