1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 102 S.E.2d
  5. 102 S.E.2d 223 (1958)
 

HARRILL v. TAYLOR

No. 22.

102 S.E.2d 223 (1958)

247 N.C. 748

Palmer HARRILL and Claude Harrill, Petitioners, v. A. C. TAYLOR and wife, Frances B. Taylor, and William H. Wilkins; F. A. Wilkie and wife, Ocie Wilkie, and Eula Lee Mayfield, Defendants.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 26, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamrick & Hamrick, Rutherfordton, J. Nat Hamrick, T. J. Moss, Forest City, and R. S. Eaves, Rutherfordton, for plaintiffappellant.

M. Leonard Lowe, Forest City, for defendant-appellees.

RODMAN, Justice.

The controversy, by stipulation of the parties that boundary only was involved, became in effect a processioning proceeding, Goodwin v. Greene, 237 N.C. 244, 74 S.E.2d 630; Clegg v. Canady, 217 N.C. 433, 8 S.E.2d 246, and was properly referred. G.S. § 1-189(3).

The judgment in September 1956 adopting the referee's findings and conclusions was a final judgment. Veazey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases