BARTOK v. BARTOK


52 N.J. Super. 266 (1958)

145 A.2d 487

MARY BARTOK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEWIS M. BARTOK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 24, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Henry J. Bendheim, attorney, and on the brief).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendant appeals a Chancery Division order denying his application for modification of the alimony provisions contained in the judgment nisi obtained by plaintiff. Our consideration of the facts leads to an affirmance.

The parties were married in 1948. Defendant was then an air pilot, making about $4,000 a year. During the eight years he lived with plaintiff he advanced in pay and position...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases