1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 3 Wis.2d
  5. 3 Wis.2d 307 (1958)
 

SULK v. SULK

3 Wis.2d 307 (1958)

SULK, Respondent, vs. SULK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 28, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Beaudry & Kershek and Eugene A. Kershek, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Eugene A. Kershek.

For the respondent there was a brief by Rice & Ramsey and Edward S. A. Ramsey, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Edward S. A. Ramsey.

WINGERT, J

The husband's claim for relief from the alimony provisions of the judgment is based entirely on the contention that the court is without authority to require payment of alimony to a divorced wife whose maiden or other former name is restored to her pursuant to sec. 247.20, Stats. The contention cannot prevail. The rights of the ex-wife and the husband's obligations to her are not dependent upon her name, but are founded upon the former marriage. Sec. 247...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases