HICKS v. KOUTRO

No. 181.

105 S.E.2d 196 (1958)

249 N.C. 61

Evangeline Koutro HICKS v. Lottie M. KOUTRO, Individually, and Lottie M. Koutro, Administratrix C.T.A. of the Will of Van P. Koutro, and Agamemnon Koutro.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 15, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell, Bradley, Gebhardt, & DeLaney, Charlotte, by Ernest S. DeLaney, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff, appellant.

L. B. Hollowell, Hugh W. Johnston, Gastonia, for defendants, appellees.


HIGGINS, Justice.

The judgment recites the parties waived a jury trial. The Court is bound by the recital. Exception No. 1 is not sustained. There is nothing in the case to show the judgment was entered out of term. The presumption of regularity prevails. Exception No. 2 is not sustained.

The question raised by the plaintiff's Exception No. 3 presents real difficulty. The pleadings raise issues of fact as to whether the Administratrix C.T.A. has mismanaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases