PER CURIAM.
This appeal seeks review of the District Court's denial without a hearing of Hagan's "Motion to Vacate" under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The contention urged was that since Counts 2, 4 and 6 cover sales of narcotics not in pursuance of the necessary written order, 26 U.S.C.A. § 2554(a) and Counts 1, 3, 5 and 7 charge receiving and concealing, 21 U.S.C.A. § 174, the drugs sold in the transactions on which Counts 2, 4 and 6 are grounded the sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
