HOLMES v. BURKETT

37340, 37356.

98 Ga. App. 189 (1958)

105 S.E.2d 236

HOLMES et al. v. BURKETT; and vice versa.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 18, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dunaway, Embry & Shelfer, William D. Shelfer, for plaintiffs in error.

Arthur G. Withers, G. Seals Aiken, W. O. Slate, contra.


NICHOLS, Judge.

1. The evidence, both oral and documentary, is quite extensive and voluminous in this case and for the purpose of passing on the usual general grounds of the motion for new trial we deem it neither necessary nor beneficial to set out or quote any portion of it. Suffice it to say that after a careful reading and a thorough consideration of the record the conclusion is mandatory that the evidence amply supports the verdict, and the trial court did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases