PER CURIAM.
This is a narcotics case in which appellant complains that the court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit on redirect examination certain information damaging to him, and which he denied. The jury decided the issue of credibility against him. While the evidence on the whole was rather weak, we think it was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
