1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 144 A.2d
  5. 144 A.2d 106 (1958)
 

SHAKESNIDER v. ROSENFELD

No. 2177.

144 A.2d 106 (1958)

Ruby M. SHAKESNIDER and Wilmer Shakesnider, Appellants, v. Philip ROSENFELD, Appellee.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided July 25, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Fauntleroy, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Saul M. Schwartzbach, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellants, husband and wife, were sued as the makers of a promissory note for the balance due thereon. Judgment went against them and they have appealed.

The facts are largely undisputed. Appellants borrowed $3,750.12 from a local bank and gave their note therefor, pledging as collateral security their savings account and the titles to six ice-cream trucks. Default in payment occurred in June 1951 when the balance due was $3,149.34...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases