HOLMAN v. VIKO

Docket Nos. 22845, 22846.

161 Cal.App.2d 87 (1958)

326 P.2d 551

FLORINE HOLMAN, Appellant, v. PAUL E. VIKO, Respondent. GIUSEPPE F. GOTTA, Appellant, v. PAUL E. VIKO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

June 4, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zeman, Hertzberg & Schekman for Appellants.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and Kenneth R. Garrett for Respondent.


ASHBURN, J.

Appeals from judgments for defendant in two companion personal injury actions. The cases were tried together before a jury and plaintiffs base their appeals upon alleged errors in instructions. Counsel claim error (1) in instructing the jury that violation of section 80.39 of Los Angeles Municipal Code would constitute negligence per se, and (2) in refusing to give an instruction on the last clear chance doctrine. We have concluded that there was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases