SEIPEL v. SEVEK


53 N.J. Super. 151 (1958)

146 A.2d 705

CHARLES SEIPEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES SEVEK AND MELBA SILVERMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ROLAND K. THEN, HERBERT M. THEN, CIRIOCO SCOPPETTUOLO AND PONTIAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).

Mr. Edward M. Gurry argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Edward M. Gurry and Messrs. Rizzolo & Montalbano, attorneys for and of counsel with respondent).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.

Defendants Sevek and Silverman appeal from a final judgment of the Law Division in favor of plaintiff on a jury verdict of $15,000 for personal injuries and $899 for damages to his automobile.

The only issue brought up for review is the propriety of the trial court's denial of a motion for involuntary dismissal of plaintiff's complaint at the close of the entire case. The basis of this asserted error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases