1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 165 Cal.App.2d
  5. 165 Cal.App.2d 39 (1958)
 

CHANDLER v. HIBBERD

Docket No. 22335.

165 Cal.App.2d 39 (1958)

332 P.2d 133

DAWN CHANDLER et al., Appellants, v. FREDERICK H. HIBBERD et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

November 12, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hanna & Morton, Harold C. Morton, James M. McRoberts, John H. Blake and Julien Francis Goux for Appellants.

Mortimer A. Kline, Edgar T. Zook, John E. Troxel, Joseph A. Ball, Clark A. Haggeness, Griffith & Thornburgh, Laselle Thornburgh, M.F. Schade, O'Melveny & Myers, Sidney H. Wall, Rodney K. Potter, Richard B. Ragland and Louis W. Myers for Respondents.

FOX, P.J.

The basic question for determination in this case is the correct location of the common boundary line between two oil producing properties. Being aggrieved by the decision after an extended trial,1 plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment and from the order denying their motion to tax costs.

The properties in question are in the South Cuyama Valley oil field in Santa Barbara County. More specifically, they are the south...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases