STATE v. SUTTER


5 Wis.2d 192 (1958)

STATE, Plaintiff in Error, v. SUTTER, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 7, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Platz.

No brief filed and no appearance for the defendant in error.


FAIRCHILD, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating sec. 939.32 (1), Stats., by attempting to violate sec. 944.01 (1). Sec. 959.15, sometimes referred to as the sex-deviate law, provides in part:

"(1) If a person is convicted under ... section 939.32 for attempting to violate section 944.01 ... the court shall commit him to the state department of public welfare for a presentence social, physical and mental examination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases