LEISKE v. BAUDHUIN YACHT HARBOR


4 Wis.2d 188 (1958)

LEISKE, Appellant, vs. BAUDHUIN YACHT HARBOR, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 6, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Rubin, Ruppa & Wegner, attorneys, and Nathan Ruppa and Norman W. Wegner of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Nathan Ruppa.

For the respondent there was a brief by Clark, Rankin, Nash, Emmerling & Spindler of Manitowoc, and oral argument by John P. Nash.


WINGERT, J.

The judgment will be affirmed.

1. Finding as to inducement. Appellant's first contention is that there is no credible evidence to support the jury's answer to question 12, that the plaintiff was not materially induced to accept delivery of the boat by Baudhuin's false representation and reliance thereon. The false representation found by the jury was that the boat was in good condition as respects...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases