BLADO v. KNOLL


4 Wis.2d 184 (1958)

BLADO, Respondent, vs. KNOLL, School Treasurer, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 6, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Rice, Rice & Rice of Sparta, and oral argument by Zelotus S. Rice.

For the respondent there was a brief by Masters, Krembs & Ambelang and L. G. Goodman, all of Sparta, and oral argument by C. D. Ambelang.


FAIRCHILD, J.

Appellant contends that neither the county court of Monroe county nor the judge of that court has power to remove an officer of a school district. Respondent apparently concedes that the county court does not have the power, but contends that the judge does and that the order removing Knoll was the order of the judge.

Both parties agree that we must look first at sec. 17.13, Stats., providing:

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases