SCHULT v. H. & C. REALTY CORP.


53 N.J. Super. 128 (1958)

146 A.2d 698

MARY SCHULT AND JOHN SCHULT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. H. & C. REALTY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. BETTY SANBERG, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Nathan Baker, of counsel; Mr. Henry Shiffman, attorney).

Mr. Raymond L. Cunneen argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Hugh J. O'Gorman, on the brief).

Before Judges PRICE, SCHETTINO and GAULKIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs in a negligence action seek to reverse a Superior Court, Law Division, judgment of no cause for action entered on a jury verdict and to reverse the denial of a motion for a new trial. Plaintiffs contend that the trial court committed prejudicial error in permitting the filing of a third-party complaint and erred also in portions of its charge to the jury and in its refusal to charge as requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases