RICHERT v. HANDLY

No. 34573.

53 Wn.2d 121 (1958)

330 P.2d 1079

THEODORE RICHERT, Appellant, v. C.C. HANDLY et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

November 6, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis & Correa and J.W. Graham, for appellant.

B. Franklin Heuston and Byron E. McClanahan, for respondents.


HUNTER, J.

This is an action for an accounting and dissolution of a logging partnership.

On the first appeal of this cause, which is reported in 50 Wn.2d 356, 311 P.2d 417 (1957), the appellant Richert failed to assign as error any of the findings of fact made by the trial court and, therefore, they became the established facts of the case. Rule on Appeal 43, 34A Wn. (2d) 47, as amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases