CARLUCCI v. STICHMAN


50 N.J. Super. 96 (1958)

141 A.2d 68

MARY CARLUCCI, DEBORAH CARLUCCI, AN INFANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HERMAN T. STICHMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 2, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James Emory argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).

Mr. Francis Sorin argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before Judges PRICE, HANEMAN and SCHETTINO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

Appellant seeks to set aside as excessive verdicts of $1,500 entered against it in favor of plaintiff Valerie Carlucci, an infant by her guardian ad litem Nicholas Carlucci, and in favor of plaintiff Mary Carlucci in the sum of $4,000. Verdicts entered in favor of another minor Deborah Carlucci in the sum of $5,000 and in favor of Nicholas Carlucci the father of Valerie and Deborah and the husband of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases