Per Curiam.
Plaintiff appeals from an order at Special Term which vacated a notice of examination before trial on the ground that the notice was defective insofar as it called for the taking of defendant's testimony by an electronic recording device.
The propriety of recording pretrial testimony in this manner remains an open question in this department. The use of recording devices has, however, been approved in the First Department, by a divided court...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
