1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 3 Wis.2d
  5. 3 Wis.2d 120 (1958)
 

BRATONJA v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE

3 Wis.2d 120 (1958)

BRATONJA, Appellant, vs. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent. GAUS, Special Administratrix, Appellant, vs. SAME, Respondent. HOFFMAN, Appellant, vs. SAME, Respondent. BECKER and another, Appellants, vs. SAME, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 4, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Joseph N. Futowsky and Albert Gould, attorneys, and Arlo A. McKinnon of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. McKinnon and Mr. Gould.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of Walter J. Mattison, city attorney, and George A. Bowman, Jr., and Harvey G. Odenbrett, assistant city attorneys.

WINGERT, J.

The appeals are founded on the contentions that the sewer was inadequate to carry away the rainfall when built in 1906, that it became more inadequate as the years went by and more and more buildings were built in the area, thus increasing the fraction of the rainfall that ran down the street and collected in the low point, that the city had notice for many years that by reason of such inadequacies plaintiffs' properties were flooded from time to time...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases