The defendant moves pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a dismissal of the second cause of action as set forth in an amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
This second cause of action is predicated on fraud because, allegedly, the defendant prior to the marriage represented that "he believed in planned...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
