PER CURIAM.
Following conviction on two counts of violation of the narcotics laws, appellant asserted here that a District Judge (not the trial judge) erred in his denial of appellant's motion before trial to suppress certain evidence simply on the basis of argument by counsel and without hearing the appellant's testimony. The record shows that the first judge summarily denied the request of defense counsel that the accused be permitted to take the stand on the motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
