NAGEL v. PHILIPSEN


4 Wis.2d 104 (1958)

NAGEL and wife, Respondents, vs. PHILIPSEN and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 6, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Strehlow & Cranston of Green Bay, and oral argument by Max H. Strehlow. No brief or appearance for the respondents.


CURRIE, J.

The plaintiffs Nagel have served no brief and are in default on this appeal. On the date set for argument counsel for the defendants moved for reversal under Supreme Court Rule 32 (sec. 251.32, Stats.). It lies within the discretion of this court whether to grant such motion. This court is somewhat hesitant to perfunctorily reverse a judgment of a trial court which undoubtedly gave the case careful consideration before entering such judgment. Upon examination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases