1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 4 Wis.2d
  5. 4 Wis.2d 103 (1958)
 

GENRICH v. MEDFORD FUR FOODS

4 Wis.2d 103 (1958)

GENRICH and another, Copartners, Appellants, vs. MEDFORD FUR FOODS, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 6, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by CLIFFORD L. CURRAN of Medford.

For the respondent there was a brief by Smith, Okoneski, Puchner & Tinkham of Wausau, and Nikolay, Jensen & Scott of Medford, and oral argument by Richard P. Tinkham and Corliss V. Jensen.

BROWN, J.

The facts set out in the pleadings regarding the sale of adulterated and poisonous mink feed, damage to plaintiffs who fed the feed to their mink, and an agreement between buyers and seller that the former would use the feed at their own risk and save the seller harmless from the consequences of such feeding are the same as those in Metz v. Medford Fur Foods, ante, p. 96, 90 N.W.2d 106. As in that action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases