The preference was predicated upon the fact that the defendant's carrier is now in liquidation. While a broad interpretation of the rule or of the term "[in] the interests of justice" is desirable, it should not be used as a means of assuring the payment of a judgment by a carrier.
The Special Term order is reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied on the facts and in the exercise...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
