1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 261 F.2d
  5. 261 F.2d 766 (1958)
 

BRAUNSTEIN v. SMITH

No. 14434.

261 F.2d 766 (1958)

Manuel BRAUNSTEIN et al., t/a Power Produce Company, Appellants, v. Hunter SMITH et al., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 26, 1958.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas S. Jackson, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Robert M. Gray and Martin R. Fain, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Rex K. Nelson, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Eugene X. Murphy, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before REED, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, retired, and BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal by defendant is from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs for damages due to injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The question is essentially whether it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury, as requested, with respect to a certain minor aspect of the evidence. In the context of the case as a whole we think the failure so to instruct did not constitute reversible error.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases