RUSH v. CHAMPLIN REFINING COMPANY

No. 37718.

321 P.2d 697 (1958)

Riley E. RUSH, Bertha L. Rush, Elden C. Gerken and Flossie M. Gerken, Plaintiffs in Error, v. CHAMPLIN REFINING COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

February 4, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.D. Greenshields, Ponca City, for plaintiffs in error.

Simons, Mitchell, Headrick & Mitchell, Enid, for V.L. Headrick, Douglas McKeever, Harry McKeever, Mary McKeever Bass, Edna E. Glasser, Joe H. Glasser and W.J. Otjen, defendants in error.

McKeever, Glasser, McKeever & Conrad, Enid, for Della Chaffee Rolston, defendant in error.

Crowley & Musser, Enid, for Maude Gray Moore and General Royalties Corporation, defendants in error.

Edward A. DeClerck, Enid, for W.E. Pralle and Barbara Chaffee Roberts Hare, defendants in error.

Robert C. Saunders, Tulsa, for Frank E. Brittain, Reuben E. Brittain, Sally B. Saunders and Robert C. Saunders, defendants in error.


WILLIAMS, Justice.

This action was brought by Riley E. Rush, and others, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against a number of named defendants to quiet title to 240 acres of land situated in Garfield County, Oklahoma. After the action was filed, several of the defendants filed disclaimers, and one defendant, Champlin Refining Company, withdrew its original pleading, a demurrer, and was granted permission to file an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases