Judgment reversed, without costs, and new trial granted.
While the evidence created a question of fact as to the first theory, it was insufficient to justify the submission to the jury on the second theory. There was no proof that appellants knew, or ought to have been warned, of the presence or probable presence of mischievous boys, or of any persons likely to start appellants' vehicle without authority. There was nothing manifest to appellants which pointed to what...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
