1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 95 Ga.
  5. 95 Ga. App. 2 (1957)
 

EDENFIELD v. STATE

36504.

95 Ga. App. 2 (1957)

96 S.E.2d 533

EDENFIELD v. THE STATE.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 22, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams & Smith, for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Lanier, Solicitor-General, contra.

CARLISLE, J.

1. It is not the object of a motion for new trial to call in question the legal sufficiency of the pleadings of the plaintiff or the sufficiency of an indictment (Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872, 874 (6), 43 S. E. 280; General Seat &c. Co. v. Bergen & Sons, 91 Ga.App. 431, 432, 85 S.E.2d 778); and where in the bill of exceptions no error is specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases