FLYNN & EMRICH COMPANY v. GREENWOOD

No. 7346.

242 F.2d 737 (1957)

FLYNN & EMRICH COMPANY, Appellant, v. Henry B. GREENWOOD and Greenwood Engineering Company, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided March 11, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles G. Page, Baltimore, Md. (White, Page & Lentz, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellant.

Harold F. Watson, Washington, D. C. (Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C., D. Franklin McGinnis, Baltimore, Md., and Haven E. Simmons, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellees.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.


HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement in which the answer sets up the usual defenses of invalidity and denial of infringement. In what is called a "counterclaim", the defendant avers that by reason of estoppel, the plaintiff can not maintain this action. The District Court heard and decided the question of estoppel in favor of the plaintiff in advance of any hearing on the defenses of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases