BLOCK v. BLOCK


4 A.D.2d 93 (1957)

Dorothy F. Block, Respondent, v. Jack L. Block, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 21, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emanuel Baetich of counsel (William Weisman, attorney), for appellant.

Daniel M. Shientag of counsel (Goldman & Drazen, attorneys), for respondent.

BREITEL, J. P., RABIN, FRANK, VALENTE and McNALLY, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

In this separation action, we have both parties professing a desire for a prompt trial, but upon terms. Plaintiff wife does not wish to go to trial unless all accrued alimony is paid. Defendant husband would go to trial without paying all of the alimony he is directed to pay.

The net result is that almost two months have passed since these parties might have had their trial and all of the issues presently before the courts would have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases