LUTENSQUI v. SUSSMAN


8 Misc.2d 902 (1957)

Sophia Lutensqui, Respondent, v. I. J. Sussman, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 7, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Edan Spencer and Robert D. Foglia for appellant.

Seymour J. Goldman and Abraham J. Yasgour for respondent.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The testimony of plaintiff and that of her lay witness, unsupported by expert testimony, is not sufficient to overcome the expert testimony of defendant that the dentures have been adjusted and the teeth are in proper occlusion (Young v. Wybrant, 61 N.Y.S.2d 473).

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, without costs.

Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases